您有新信

 
Neuroscience backs up the Buddhist belief that “the self” isn’t
#1
@Facebook
神經科學研究持續佐證佛法所謂心性無常。隨著相關研究技術的深入與發展,應有助
於以科學語言釐清許多佛法的核心概念,甚至在可預見的未來,協助開發更有效率的
修行策略。


Neuroscience backs up the Buddhist belief that “the self” isn’t constant, but ever-changing

You may believe that your essential being has always been the same. But Buddhism—and science—tell us that's an illusion.

Tue Oct 13 23:17:13 2015
回覆 | 轉寄 | 返回

Neuroscience backs up the Buddhist belief that “the self” isn’t
#2
@Facebook
神經科學研究持續佐證佛法所謂心性無常。隨著相關研究技術的深入與發展,應有助
於以科學語言釐清許多佛法的核心概念,甚至在可預見的未來,協助開發更有效率的
修行策略。


Neuroscience backs up the Buddhist belief that “the self” isn’t constant, but ever-changing

You may believe that your essential being has always been the same. But Buddhism—and science—tell us that's an illusion.

Tue Oct 13 23:17:13 2015
回覆 | 轉寄 | 返回

Re: Neuroscience backs up the Buddhist belief that “the self” isn’t
#3
@Facebook
請問:But neither neuroscience nor Buddhism has a definitive answer on 
exactly how consciousness relates to the brain. And the two fields diverge
on certain aspects of the topic. Buddhists believe that there’s some form
of consciousness that’s not dependent on the physical body, while 
neuroscientists (and Thompson), disagree.

這一段的最後一句,是在講四無色陰還是無色界的生命?:-)
Wed Oct 14 00:39:34 2015
回覆 | 轉寄 | 返回

Re: Neuroscience backs up the Buddhist belief that “the self” isn’t
#4
@Facebook
看起來是的,以目前神經科學的進展,在技術上連觀測依附人身的意識運作都十分有
限了,要再去評論其它境界的意識實在力有未逮。研究者們表達不同意的看法,不見
意味著否定,而是基於缺乏足夠證據下的一種不肯定態度。
Wed Oct 14 00:55:49 2015
回覆 | 轉寄 | 返回

卍 台大獅子吼佛學專站  http://buddhaspace.org