Re: [�ܤߩ����K�T�c�D] <�W���B�T�Q�G�B�T�Q�K�B�Q> |
|
ºK¥y¿ï¤À°O¿ý:
¤j¼w: guest
¤j¼w: a%26gt%3B++%26quot%3BThe+NAO%26amp%3B%23039%3Bs+conclusions+were+the+basis+for+our+evidence+given+to+the+PAC+yesterday+and+like+the+NAO%2C+we+see+nothing+in+this+correspondence+which+disproves+any+of+their+conclusions%2C%26quot%3B+the+statement+continued.%3CBR%3E+
¯¬±zºÖ¼zÂù×!
|